Organization > IHP+ Working Groups
Monitoring & Evaluation
The scale-up for better health is unprecedented in both potential resources and in the number of initiatives involved. Such a grand experiment requires a harmonized monitoring and evaluation effort that reinforces both country and global needs to demonstrate results, secure future funding, and enhance the evidence base for intervention. Eventually, the scale-up efforts will be judged by country progress towards the health-related MDGs, the degree to which major health constraints in countries have been addressed, and adherence to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.
The common framework for monitoring performance and
evaluation of the scale-up for better health aims to
ensure that the demand for accountability and results
from single donor and joint initiatives is translated
into well-coordinated efforts to monitor performance and
evaluate progress and results in-country. It also
stresses the importance of working in ways that
contribute to strengthening country organizational
capacity and health information systems, as well as
enabling evidence-informed decision making and improved
country performance. The framework for evaluation of the
scale-up in the spirit of the Paris Declaration can be
translated into the following six principles: collective
action, alignment with country processes, balance
between country participation and independence,
harmonized approaches to performance assessment,
capacity building and health information systems
strengthening, and adequate funding.
read more on 'A Common Framework for Monitoring and
Evaluation'...

| WHO | World Bank | UNFPA | UNAIDS | GFATM | OECD-DAC | |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Ties Boerma | Ed Bos | Stan Bernstein | George Tembo | Daniel Low Beer | Elisabeth Sandor |
| Dela Devlo |
